Ethical Aspect: Differences in Ethical Standards When Considering Arbitration Cases Involving Third-Party Funding

Authors

  • Rakhmonov Jamoliddin 2nd year student of the doctoral program (PhD) direction 12.00.03 - Civil law. Business law. Family law. International private law. Tashkent State University of Law. Tashkent, Sayilgokh Street

Keywords:

Third-Party Funding (TPF), International Arbitration, Ethics, Conflicts of Interest, Disclosure, Arbitrator Impartiality, Confidentiality

Abstract

This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the ethical challenges introduced by Third-Party Funding (TPF) in international arbitration. It examines the fundamental conflicts of interest, threats to confidentiality, and issues of funder control that disrupt traditional ethical standards. Through a critical discussion of the fragmented regulatory landscape, institutional rules, and landmark case law, the report identifies the core problems and proposes a multi-layered solution aimed at harmonizing disclosure requirements and strengthening ethical duties to preserve the integrity of the arbitral process.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-04

How to Cite

Jamoliddin , R. (2025). Ethical Aspect: Differences in Ethical Standards When Considering Arbitration Cases Involving Third-Party Funding. Web of Semantics : Journal of Interdisciplinary Science, 3(8), 4–11. Retrieved from https://web.semanticjournals.org/index.php/wos/article/view/843

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.